Sony "Carl Zeiss" 16-35 f/2.8
Minolta 24-105 f/3.5-4.5.
Here again, you need to click the pictures to see the full resolution. It should open in a new window (or new tab if you use them). This make it easier to open a few pictures and flip between them for comparison. Personally, I use tabs so I just need to click on them to flip back and for between the pictures I want to compare. The name of the pictures gives lens, focal length and aperture.
Here the center pictures:
f-stop | Sony CZ 16-35 | Minolta 24-105 |
f/2.8 |  | |
f/4 |  |  |
f/5.6 |  |  |
f/8 |  |  |
f/11 |  |  |
The CZ is reputed to be less good at 35mm, you can see for yourself that it is still quite good. Even the corner sharpness is fine from f/4.0 onwards. The 24-105 is usable from f/5.6 onwards.
Before we continues with 50mm, the next post will show something different: how much better is a full frame camera compared to an APS-C camera, or even a four third camera and a pocketable P&S?
